This weekend at Manchester Museum, researchers from the University of Manchester gave one-minute microlectures to the public on the subject of biomedical research. The ‘Manchester Minute Microlectures’ event challenged the researchers to explain aspects of their work in just 60 seconds, followed by tea, cake and questions. It was a real eye-opening event (part of a day of family activities at the museum on the subject of the human body) and a great way to gain insight into an area of science most of us wouldn’t normally be exposed to. The challenge for the speakers of course was to crystallize their message and ‘sell’ their research to an audience of people from eight to eighty years old with no knowledge of the subject whatsoever….. in just one minute.
The microlecture format is growing in popularity in education. Of course, in comms we have the rather tired but effective ‘elevator pitch’ concept in which we encourage teams and functions to memorise and sell their vision/project in about 40 seconds …. the scenario being that you bump into the CEO in an elevator and he asks you what you’re working on. You’ve got until the doors open to make your impact. Microlectures offer greater variety. They can be in video, podcast, presentation or ‘stand-up’ format, from one minute to (roughly) five or six. As refreshers or ‘quick dip’ exposures they can be really effective. For the ‘seller’ or presenter, it forces the selection of not the ‘important’ messages or the ‘really important’ messages, but the ‘most important’ messages. And it encourages creativity. If you’ve got one minute to make an impact, wouldn’t you look to do something different? Microlectures can be fun too, by pitching competing or diverse topics together in a Dragon’s Den environment, or inviting the audience to vote on the talk that made the most impact.
In Manchester at the weekend, some lectures succeeded, other’s didn’t. The speakers who did well were (surprise, surprise) the ones who told stories. In their best-seller Made to Stick, authors Chip and Dan Heath recall an experiment in which they asked Stanford students to give a one-minute presentation on crime patterns in the United States. They were all given the same source material but half the group was asked to deliver a one-minute persuasive speech to convince their peers that nonviolent crime is a serious problem in the country. The other half were told to take the contrary position – that it wasn’t particularly serious. After each speech, the presenters were rated on their delivery and persuasive ability. Not surprisingly, the eloquent, polished and charismatic speakers rated highly. At the end, the experiment appeared to be over and the facilitator moved on to something else. Then, ten minutes later, he stopped abruptly and asked the students to pull out a piece of paper and write down, for each speaker they heard, every idea or message they remember. Guess what? The students could barely remember anything! They only heard eight one-minute speeches and it was only ten minutes ago, but they could hardly remember a single message from each talk …. EXCEPT for those who told stories. On average, 63 per cent remembered the stories, while only five per cent remembered the statistics. They also found that the polished speakers did no better when it came to remembering the messages. It was the story, not the delivery, that made the difference.
So why not consider the microlecture format when you’re thinking of ways to share knowledge, explain a project, debunk some jargon, impart some learning or build a community. It’s good for the speaker, good for the audience and great for the organisation. Just remember the stories.